SANJUKTA PAUL R KHARKRANG, M. SARKAR,T. MARNGAR,A. SYIEM vs MEGHALAYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. Advocate - MR. S DEY, P.R. PASKE,J SUCHIANG,N LAMARE — WP(C)/157/2026

Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: MLHC010005142026

Filing Number

WP(C)/358/2026

Filing Date

09-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/157/2026

Registration Date

09-Apr-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

OTHER WRIT PETITIONS ( 10 )

Sub-Category

Other Civil Rules ( 10189 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 23-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SANJUKTA PAUL R KHARKRANG, M. SARKAR,T. MARNGAR,A. SYIEM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MEGHALAYA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS. Advocate - MR. S DEY, P.R. PASKE,J SUCHIANG,N LAMARE

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  3. 22-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Meghalaya admitted the writ petition WP(C) No. 157 of 2026 filed by Smti Sanjukta Paul against Meghalaya Urban Development Authority and others. Notice was issued to all respondents, and the petitioner was permitted to effect personal service on respondent No. 3. The matter was adjourned to 16.06.2026 with respondents granted two weeks to file their affidavits; the interim prayer was deferred pending full participation of all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  5. 06-May-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. Thangkhiew

  6. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice H. S. ThangkhiewView PDF

  7. 15-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 09-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Meghalaya admitted the writ petition WP(C) No. 157 of 2026 filed by Smti Sanjukta Paul against Meghalaya Urban Development Authority and others. Notice was issued to all respondents, and the petitioner was permitted to effect personal service on respondent No. 3. The matter was adjourned to 16.06.2026 with respondents granted two weeks to file their affidavits; the interim prayer was deferred pending full participation of all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case