NERIS LAMARE M. DHAR, K.S. KYNJING, SR. ADV.,D. SANA,D. CHADONG,D. BUAM,C.M. MARAK,B. RAPSANG,G. SYNGKREM,A.D. SYIEM vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, S KH NONGRUM, GA — AB/7/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.
CNR: MLHC010004692026
Filing Number
AB/135/2026
Filing Date
02-Apr-2026
Registration No
AB/7/2026
Registration Date
02-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL REVISIONS AND OTHER CASES ( 18 )
Sub-Category
Anticipatory Bail application unde Section 438 Cr.P.C. ( 10267 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
15-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 23-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NERIS LAMARE M. DHAR, K.S. KYNJING, SR. ADV.,D. SANA,D. CHADONG,D. BUAM,C.M. MARAK,B. RAPSANG,G. SYNGKREM,A.D. SYIEM
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ORS. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, S KH NONGRUM, GA (Government Advocate)
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Meghalaya dismissed Neris Lamare's anticipatory bail petition in a land dispute case (Khliehriat P.S. Case No. 104 of 2026) involving gunshot injuries. The court held that the petitioner had violated a prior Sessions Court order directing surrender within 48 hours and therefore was not entitled to relief, instead directing him to comply with the original order by surrendering to the investigating officer within 48 hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh
-
08-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. DiengdohView PDF
-
08-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. AB/7/2026
Case Summary The High Court of Meghalaya dismissed Neris Lamare's anticipatory bail petition in a land dispute case (Khliehriat P.S. Case No. 104 of 2026) involving gunshot injuries. The court held that the petitioner had violated a prior Sessions Court order directing surrender within 48 hours and therefore was not entitled to relief, instead directing him to comply with the original order by surrendering to the investigating officer within 48 hours. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts