RITOS MAWLONG P AGARWAL, LEGAL AID COUNSEL vs STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA — Crl.A./13/2026

Next hearing: 20th April 2026.

Next hearing 20-Apr-2026

CNR: MLHC010003682026

Filing Number

Crl.A./88/2026

Filing Date

18-Mar-2026

Registration No

Crl.A./13/2026

Registration Date

19-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

CRIMINAL APPEALS ( 17 )

Sub-Category

Appeals against conviction under other Acts ( 10253 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 17-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RITOS MAWLONG P AGARWAL, LEGAL AID COUNSEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA

Case History

  1. 20-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 20-Apr-2026

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee

  3. 25-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh,hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF

    Summary: The High Court of Meghalaya admitted the criminal appeal filed by Shri. Ritos Mawlong against his conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, where he was sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a ₹5,000 fine by the Special Judge, East Khasi Hills District. The Court called for trial records to prepare the case file and scheduled the matter for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. Crl.A./13/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The High Court of Meghalaya admitted the criminal appeal filed by Shri. Ritos Mawlong against his conviction under Section 6 of the POCSO Act, where he was sentenced to 10 years rigorous imprisonment with a ₹5,000 fine by the Special Judge, East Khasi Hills District. The Court called for trial records to prepare the case file and scheduled the matter for hearing after three weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case