PINGTON LAMARE A. SURANA, LAC vs THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA MEGHALAYA, ,R GURUNG, GA, MEGHALAYA — Crl.A./7/2026
Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
CNR: MLHC010001812026
Filing Number
Crl.A./42/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
Crl.A./7/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CRIMINAL APPEALS ( 17 )
Sub-Category
Appeals against conviction for offences under IPC ( 10250 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PINGTON LAMARE A. SURANA, LAC
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MEGHALAYA AND ANR. Advocate - N.G. SHYLLA, SR. GA (Government Advocate) MEGHALAYA, ,R GURUNG, GA (Government Advocate), MEGHALAYA
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
29-Jun-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
03-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh,hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
In Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2026, the High Court of Meghalaya adjourned the matter for three weeks without deciding the substantive issues. The State respondent failed to appear despite being a party to the case, and only the petitioner's legal aid counsel was present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
03-Jun-2026
Hearing
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh,hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
23-Mar-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh , Hon'ble Mr. Justice B. Bhattacharjee
-
25-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice W. Diengdoh,hon'ble Mr. Justice B. BhattacharjeeView PDF
-
25-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.A./7/2026
In Criminal Appeal No. 7 of 2026, the High Court of Meghalaya adjourned the matter for three weeks without deciding the substantive issues. The State respondent failed to appear despite being a party to the case, and only the petitioner's legal aid counsel was present. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts