Mutum Ongbi Thingujam Sanathoi Leima and 6 Ors Romesh Chandra Yumnam, ,Mr Y THOIBA,MS. PRIYASHIMALA S vs State of Manipur and 2 Ors Advocate - MR. L SOMORENDRO ROY, IPHAM SHARMILA RAHMAN — MC(WP(C))/638/2025
Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: MNHC010023312025
e-Filing Number
27-08-2025
Filing Number
MC(WP(C))/2131/2025
Filing Date
27-Aug-2025
Registration No
MC(WP(C))/638/2025
Registration Date
27-Aug-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 30-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mutum Ongbi Thingujam Sanathoi Leima and 6 Ors Romesh Chandra Yumnam, ,Mr Y THOIBA,MS. PRIYASHIMALA S
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Manipur and 2 Ors Advocate - MR. L SOMORENDRO ROY, IPHAM SHARMILA RAHMAN
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
06-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
01-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
The High Court of Manipur adjourned the case to 08.06.2026 after the petitioners failed to appear for hearing. The State respondent opposed referral to the Special Mediation Drive ('Mediation for the Nation'), arguing the matter was unsuitable for mediation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Apr-2026
For Referral To The Spl. Mediation Drive-Mediation 'For The Nation 2.0'
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
19-Nov-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
-
01-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
-
01-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
-
27-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MC(WP(C))/638/2025
The High Court of Manipur adjourned the case to 08.06.2026 after the petitioners failed to appear for hearing. The State respondent opposed referral to the Special Mediation Drive ('Mediation for the Nation'), arguing the matter was unsuitable for mediation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts