Leitanthem Priyojit Meitei and 2 Ors THOUNAOJAM KHAGEMBA, ,MS. T VICTORIA vs State of Manipur and Anr — WP(C)/466/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 20th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: MNHC010015762026

e-Filing Number

19-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1400/2026

Filing Date

19-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/466/2026

Registration Date

19-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP(C) ( 36 )

Sub-Category

Other service matters. ( 10040 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

20-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Leitanthem Priyojit Meitei and 2 Ors THOUNAOJAM KHAGEMBA, ,MS. T VICTORIA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Manipur and Anr

  2. 2.The COHSEM through its Secretary

    Adv. MR. U AUGUSTA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF

    The High Court of Manipur disposed of the writ petition by directing the Council of Higher Secondary Education, Manipur to decide the petitioners' two pending representations (dated 07.03.2022 and 10.03.2025) regarding their appointment against waiting list vacancies for LDA and Grade-IV positions within one month through a speaking order. The court expressly refrained from expressing any opinion on the merit of the representations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

  4. 19-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/466/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Manipur disposed of the writ petition by directing the Council of Higher Secondary Education, Manipur to decide the petitioners' two pending representations (dated 07.03.2022 and 10.03.2025) regarding their appointment against waiting list vacancies for LDA and Grade-IV positions within one month through a speaking order. The court expressly refrained from expressing any opinion on the merit of the representations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case