Mandeep Kumar and 32 Others LINTHOINGAMBI SORAM, ,MR. L SHYAM vs State of Manipur and 6 Ors — MC(WP(C))/478/2026

Disposed: --Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: MNHC010015532026

e-Filing Number

17-06-2026

Filing Number

MC(WP(C))/1379/2026

Filing Date

17-Jun-2026

Registration No

MC(WP(C))/478/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Coram

Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--Disposed Off

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mandeep Kumar and 32 Others LINTHOINGAMBI SORAM, ,MR. L SHYAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Manipur and 6 Ors

    Adv. DEEPAK PRASAD SAHU - R5, R6, R7,DSGI - R3,N. NONGDAMBA - R3 1123

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Manipur disposed of a writ petition filed by 33 students concerning their representation dated 11.06.2026 submitted to the Controller of Examination, Manipur University regarding examination-related grievances. The court directed the Controller to consider and decide the representation on merit and in accordance with applicable rules within three months, with communication of the decision to petitioners within two weeks thereafter. The court clarified that no substantive merit of the petition was adjudicated, acting with the consent of all counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh

  4. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF

  5. 17-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MC(WP(C))/478/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Manipur disposed of a writ petition filed by 33 students concerning their representation dated 11.06.2026 submitted to the Controller of Examination, Manipur University regarding examination-related grievances. The court directed the Controller to consider and decide the representation on merit and in accordance with applicable rules within three months, with communication of the decision to petitioners within two weeks thereafter. The court clarified that no substantive merit of the petition was adjudicated, acting with the consent of all counsel. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case