Yumnam Ranjit Singh and 4 Others NIKITA MANGSATABAM, NIRAJ PAONAM vs State of Manipur and 6 Others — WP(C)/452/2026

Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: MNHC010015462026

e-Filing Number

16-06-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1372/2026

Filing Date

16-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/452/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

WP(C) ( 36 )

Sub-Category

Salary and allowances. ( 10026 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Withdrawn

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yumnam Ranjit Singh and 4 Others NIKITA MANGSATABAM, NIRAJ PAONAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.State of Manipur and 6 Others

  2. 2.The Commissioner Finance

    Adv. GA

  3. 3.The Additional Chief Secretary TA and Hills

    Adv. GA

  4. 4.The Commissioner Hr Tech and Edn

    Adv. GA

  5. 5.The Commissioner Home

    Adv. GA

  6. 6.The Commissioner Works

    Adv. GA

  7. 7.The Manipur Public Service Commission through its Secretary

    Adv. IROM BIMOLA DEVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF

    The High Court of Manipur allowed withdrawal of the writ petition due to a technical error in the prayer clause. The court permitted petitioners to refile after correcting the error while preserving all their rights and contentions. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh

  4. 16-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/452/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Manipur allowed withdrawal of the writ petition due to a technical error in the prayer clause. The court permitted petitioners to refile after correcting the error while preserving all their rights and contentions. No costs were awarded. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case