Dayasagar Laishram IROM RAJESH SINGH, ,MR. AJOY PEBAM,MR. L ROJESHON,GUNACHANDRA vs State of Manipur and 4 Ors — WP(C)/429/2026
Next hearing: 10th August 2026.
CNR: MNHC010014742026
e-Filing Number
08-06-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1305/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/429/2026
Registration Date
08-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP(C) ( 36 )
Sub-Category
Promotion. ( 10028 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 10-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dayasagar Laishram IROM RAJESH SINGH, ,MR. AJOY PEBAM,MR. L ROJESHON,GUNACHANDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Manipur and 4 Ors
-
2.The Commissioner Principal Secretary Secretary Addl Chief Secretary PWD
Adv. GA
-
3.The Chief Engineer PWD
Adv. GA
-
4.The Manipur Public Service Commission represented by its Secretary
Adv. BETI
-
5.Smt Ningthoujam Monika Chanu
Case History
-
10-Aug-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Aug-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
Summary: The Manipur High Court heard a writ petition challenging the promotion of respondent no. 5 to Assistant Engineer (Civil) under the SC category, when the petitioner claims respondent no. 5 was originally appointed under the OBC(M) category in 2016. The petitioner contends that respondent no. 5's recategorization as SC is improper and blocks available SC seats meant for SC candidates. The court issued notice to all respondents, directed the petitioner to serve respondent no. 5 within one week, and adjourned the case to August 10, 2026, with interim relief to be decided upon respondent no. 5's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/429/2026
Summary: The Manipur High Court heard a writ petition challenging the promotion of respondent no. 5 to Assistant Engineer (Civil) under the SC category, when the petitioner claims respondent no. 5 was originally appointed under the OBC(M) category in 2016. The petitioner contends that respondent no. 5's recategorization as SC is improper and blocks available SC seats meant for SC candidates. The court issued notice to all respondents, directed the petitioner to serve respondent no. 5 within one week, and adjourned the case to August 10, 2026, with interim relief to be decided upon respondent no. 5's appearance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts