Ukhrul District Taxi Welfare Association MAIBAM RENDY SINGH, ,MR. JUNO RAHMAN,THOMAS LAISHRAM,MD. ASHIF SHAH,THIYAM ROHITKUMAR SINGH vs State of Manipur and 5 Ors — WP(C)/404/2026
Disposed: Contested--Withdrawn on 04th June 2026.
CNR: MNHC010013922026
e-Filing Number
01-06-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1234/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/404/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP(C) ( 36 )
Sub-Category
Other Civil Rules. ( 10189 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Withdrawn
Last updated 06-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ukhrul District Taxi Welfare Association MAIBAM RENDY SINGH, ,MR. JUNO RAHMAN,THOMAS LAISHRAM,MD. ASHIF SHAH,THIYAM ROHITKUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Manipur and 5 Ors
-
2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY/ COMMISSIONER/ SECRETARY (TRANSPORT)
-
3.THE DIRECTOR OF TRANSPORT
-
4.THE REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES
-
5.THE DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF SOCIETIES
-
6.THE IMPHAL UKHRUL ZONAL TAXI ASSOCIATION
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
The High Court of Manipur dismissed the writ petition filed by Ukhrul District Taxi Welfare Association against the State of Manipur and others on June 4, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and was granted leave to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition if advised. No substantive order on merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Jun-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
-
02-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
-
02-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/404/2026
The High Court of Manipur dismissed the writ petition filed by Ukhrul District Taxi Welfare Association against the State of Manipur and others on June 4, 2026. The petitioner's counsel sought and was granted leave to withdraw the petition, with liberty to file a fresh petition if advised. No substantive order on merits was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts