Caroline Zothangmawi THANGCHUNGHNUNG LEIVON, MELODY CHONNEIKIM,SOPHIA HATNEINEM HAOKIP,GINZAMANG SITLHOU vs State of Manipur and 3 Ors — WP(C)/402/2026
Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.
CNR: MNHC010013792026
e-Filing Number
29-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1222/2026
Filing Date
30-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/402/2026
Registration Date
30-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP(C) ( 36 )
Sub-Category
Promotion. ( 10028 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 02-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Caroline Zothangmawi THANGCHUNGHNUNG LEIVON, MELODY CHONNEIKIM,SOPHIA HATNEINEM HAOKIP,GINZAMANG SITLHOU
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Manipur and 3 Ors
-
2.The CommissionerSecretary, Higher and Technical
-
3.The Principal Secretary Commissioner Secretary Additional Secretary, Department of Personnel
-
4.Ginzamang T Zomi
Case History
-
03-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
03-Jun-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
01-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: The High Court of Manipur in WP(C) No. 402/2026 heard a challenge by Caroline Zothangmawi, Vice-Principal of Churachandpur College, against an interim order dated 14.05.2026 assigning respondent no. 4 to look after the Principal's post. The petitioner contended the order violated the 03.10.2020 O.M. guidelines, as she (ranked 2nd in seniority) should have been considered before respondent no. 4 (ranked 7th). The court adjourned the matter to 03.06.2026 to allow the State to file necessary instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-Jun-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
30-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/402/2026
Case Summary: The High Court of Manipur in WP(C) No. 402/2026 heard a challenge by Caroline Zothangmawi, Vice-Principal of Churachandpur College, against an interim order dated 14.05.2026 assigning respondent no. 4 to look after the Principal's post. The petitioner contended the order violated the 03.10.2020 O.M. guidelines, as she (ranked 2nd in seniority) should have been considered before respondent no. 4 (ranked 7th). The court adjourned the matter to 03.06.2026 to allow the State to file necessary instructions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts