Denish Mariamei and 10 Ors HAOROKCHAM KUNJESHORI DEVI, ABHISHEK P SAHU,MR. ANJAN PRASAD SAHU,KH. NAKATO,LAKSHMI L,ABHISHEK P SAHU,M. SAKA,T PAMEI vs Manipur Legislative Assembly and Anr Advocate - WAHENGBAM JAMON SINGH, ,MR. DEEPAK PRASAD SAHU — WP(C)/399/2026

Next hearing: 03rd June 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: MNHC010013762026

e-Filing Number

30-05-2026

Filing Number

WP(C)/1219/2026

Filing Date

30-May-2026

Registration No

WP(C)/399/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

WP(C) ( 36 )

Sub-Category

Appointment on compassionate ground. ( 10044 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Denish Mariamei and 10 Ors HAOROKCHAM KUNJESHORI DEVI, ABHISHEK P SAHU,MR. ANJAN PRASAD SAHU,KH. NAKATO,LAKSHMI L,ABHISHEK P SAHU,M. SAKA,T PAMEI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manipur Legislative Assembly and Anr Advocate - WAHENGBAM JAMON SINGH, ,MR. DEEPAK PRASAD SAHU

  2. 2.The Speaker Manipur Legislative Assembly

Case History

  1. 03-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Motion

    Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF

    Summary of WP(C) 399/2026 The petitioners challenged a May 20, 2026 recruitment order by the Manipur Legislative Assembly for 85 Group-C & D posts, contending that no 10% seats were reserved under the die-in-harness scheme. The respondents sought two days to verify whether such reservation exists. The case was adjourned to June 3, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(C)/399/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(C) 399/2026 The petitioners challenged a May 20, 2026 recruitment order by the Manipur Legislative Assembly for 85 Group-C & D posts, contending that no 10% seats were reserved under the die-in-harness scheme. The respondents sought two days to verify whether such reservation exists. The case was adjourned to June 3, 2026 for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case