N Romeo Singh KONJENGBAM ROSHAN, HUIDROM MANGI,S. LANGLENTHOIBI,ROSCOE M vs Union of India and 4 Others — WP(C)/356/2026
Next hearing: 15th July 2026.
CNR: MNHC010012242026
e-Filing Number
18-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1083/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/356/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP(C) ( 36 )
Sub-Category
Transfer ( 10070 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 29-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.N Romeo Singh KONJENGBAM ROSHAN, HUIDROM MANGI,S. LANGLENTHOIBI,ROSCOE M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India and 4 Others
-
2.The Director General of Police CRPF
Adv. DSGI
-
3.The IGP Manipur and Nagaland CRPF
Adv. DSGI
-
4.The DIGP Estt Dte CRPF CGO
Adv. DSGI
-
5.The Commandant 216 Bn
Adv. DSGI
Case History
-
15-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jul-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 356/2026 - N Romeo Singh v. Union of India The petitioner, a CRPF officer, challenged his transfer order from GC-Imphal to 216 Battalion CRPF, Odisha (dated 22.12.2025) and the rejection of his representation (10.02.2026), citing his wife's acute medical conditions under Standing Order 04/2022. The court denied interim relief, finding the wife's psychiatric condition not covered under the specified medical grounds for retention. The case was adjourned to 15.07.2026, though the court clarified that respondents may still consider the petitioner's compassionate ground representation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/356/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 356/2026 - N Romeo Singh v. Union of India The petitioner, a CRPF officer, challenged his transfer order from GC-Imphal to 216 Battalion CRPF, Odisha (dated 22.12.2025) and the rejection of his representation (10.02.2026), citing his wife's acute medical conditions under Standing Order 04/2022. The court denied interim relief, finding the wife's psychiatric condition not covered under the specified medical grounds for retention. The case was adjourned to 15.07.2026, though the court clarified that respondents may still consider the petitioner's compassionate ground representation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts