N Romeo Singh KONJENGBAM ROSHAN, HUIDROM MANGI,S. LANGLENTHOIBI,JONTYROSCOE M vs Union of India and 4 Ors — MC(WP(C))/375/2026

Next hearing: 15th July 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jul-2026

CNR: MNHC010012232026

e-Filing Number

18-05-2026

Filing Number

MC(WP(C))/1082/2026

Filing Date

18-May-2026

Registration No

MC(WP(C))/375/2026

Registration Date

18-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

Coram

Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 29-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.N Romeo Singh KONJENGBAM ROSHAN, HUIDROM MANGI,S. LANGLENTHOIBI,JONTYROSCOE M

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India and 4 Ors

Case History

  1. 15-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jul-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma

  3. 19-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: MC(WP(C)) No. 375/2026 The High Court of Manipur heard N Romeo Singh's petition challenging his transfer from GC-Imphal to 216 Battalion CRPF, Odisha (dated 22.12.2025) and rejection of his representation (10.02.2026). He claimed his wife's acute medical conditions warranted retention under Standing Order 04/2022. The Court declined to grant interim relief, noting the wife's psychiatric condition is not covered under the retention grounds, and adjourned the case to 15.07.2026. However, the Court clarified that respondents may still consider his compassionate ground representation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. MC(WP(C))/375/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MC(WP(C)) No. 375/2026 The High Court of Manipur heard N Romeo Singh's petition challenging his transfer from GC-Imphal to 216 Battalion CRPF, Odisha (dated 22.12.2025) and rejection of his representation (10.02.2026). He claimed his wife's acute medical conditions warranted retention under Standing Order 04/2022. The Court declined to grant interim relief, noting the wife's psychiatric condition is not covered under the retention grounds, and adjourned the case to 15.07.2026. However, the Court clarified that respondents may still consider his compassionate ground representation during petition pendency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case