Sorokhaibam Surbala Devi SYED MURTAZA AHMED, ABDUL BAQEE KHAN vs State of Manipur and 5 Ors — WP(C)/351/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 19th May 2026.
CNR: MNHC010012082026
e-Filing Number
18-05-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/1069/2026
Filing Date
18-May-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/351/2026
Registration Date
18-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP(C) ( 36 )
Sub-Category
Other Civil Rules. ( 10189 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 29-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sorokhaibam Surbala Devi SYED MURTAZA AHMED, ABDUL BAQEE KHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Manipur and 5 Ors
Adv. DSGI - R5,N. NONGDAMBA - R5 1123
-
2.THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE
-
3.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE
-
4.THE OFFICER-IN-CHARGE, WOMEN POLICE STATION
-
5.THE REGIONAL INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCES
-
6.SHRI GURUARIBAM SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
Case Summary: WP(C) 351/2026 The High Court of Manipur dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Sorokhaibam Surbala Devi seeking directions to register an FIR against an alleged offender for misconduct at RIMS, Imphal. The court found the petition premature because the petitioner failed to exhaust statutory remedies under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)—specifically, she had not approached the Magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS after police refusal, and she lacked justification for the eleven-month delay between the alleged incident and filing her complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-May-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
-
18-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/351/2026
Case Summary: WP(C) 351/2026 The High Court of Manipur dismissed the writ petition filed by Smt. Sorokhaibam Surbala Devi seeking directions to register an FIR against an alleged offender for misconduct at RIMS, Imphal. The court found the petition premature because the petitioner failed to exhaust statutory remedies under the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS)—specifically, she had not approached the Magistrate under Section 175(3) BNSS after police refusal, and she lacked justification for the eleven-month delay between the alleged incident and filing her complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts