Moirangthem Dhanabir Singh Syed Murtaza Ahmed vs Officer in Charge, Lamphel Police Station and Anr — Crl.M.C./11/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 26th March 2026.
CNR: MNHC010007332026
e-Filing Number
25-03-2026
Filing Number
Crl.M.C./116/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
Crl.M.C./11/2026
Registration Date
25-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Moirangthem Dhanabir Singh Syed Murtaza Ahmed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Officer in Charge, Lamphel Police Station and Anr
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar SharmaView PDF
Summary: The High Court of Manipur granted permission to petitioner Moirangthem Dhanabir Singh, an accused in an extortion case under IPC sections 384/506/120-B and on interim anticipatory bail, to leave Manipur from March 27 to April 5, 2026 to attend an Akhil Bharatiya Hind Kranti Party meeting in Delhi. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to submit air tickets to the Investigating Officer and appear before the IO upon return, addressing the prosecution's concerns about non-compliance and absconding risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr Justice A.Guneshwar Sharma
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. Crl.M.C./11/2026
Summary: The High Court of Manipur granted permission to petitioner Moirangthem Dhanabir Singh, an accused in an extortion case under IPC sections 384/506/120-B and on interim anticipatory bail, to leave Manipur from March 27 to April 5, 2026 to attend an Akhil Bharatiya Hind Kranti Party meeting in Delhi. The court imposed conditions requiring the petitioner to submit air tickets to the Investigating Officer and appear before the IO upon return, addressing the prosecution's concerns about non-compliance and absconding risk. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts