Soibam Shashikanta Singh KONJENGBAM ROSHAN, S. LANGLENTHOIBI,MR. CHURCHIL,JAGATCHANDRA,JONTY ROSCOE M vs Union of India and 3 Ors — WP(C)/196/2026
Disposed: Contested--Closed on 30th March 2026.
CNR: MNHC010006272026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
WP(C)/551/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP(C)/196/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Coram
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WP(C) ( 36 )
Sub-Category
Transfer ( 10070 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Closed
Last updated 17-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Soibam Shashikanta Singh KONJENGBAM ROSHAN, S. LANGLENTHOIBI,MR. CHURCHIL,JAGATCHANDRA,JONTY ROSCOE M
Respondent(s)
-
1.Union of India and 3 Ors
-
2.The Director General of Police CRPF
-
3.The IGP Manipur and Nagaland Sector
-
4.Deputy Inspector General ORG
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
Case Summary The High Court of Manipur disposed of a writ petition by directing the CRPF Director General to reconsider the petitioner's representation for retention at his current posting, taking into account his ongoing medical treatment. The court granted discretionary authority to the respondent to decide on the request within two weeks, without prejudging the petition's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
-
26-Mar-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
-
16-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
-
16-Mar-2026
Motion
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol Singh
-
13-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr Justice Ahanthem Bimol SinghView PDF
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(C)/196/2026
Case Summary The High Court of Manipur disposed of a writ petition by directing the CRPF Director General to reconsider the petitioner's representation for retention at his current posting, taking into account his ongoing medical treatment. The court granted discretionary authority to the respondent to decide on the request within two weeks, without prejudging the petition's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts