EDWIN DAVID, (DIED) M/S.M.P.SENTHIL, A.MOHAMED HANEEF CHANGE OF VAKALAT FILED FOR AA2 & 3 SR.21008 DT.24.06.2024,M/S.V.M.BALAMOHAN THAMBI FOR A4,A1 - DIED (MEMO FILED USR.4650 DT. 24.11. vs LAWRENCE, — SA/1649/2003

Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD012857852017

Filing Number

SA/1001649/2003

Filing Date

29-Sep-2003

Registration No

SA/1649/2003

Registration Date

20-Aug-2003

Judge

Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Coram

Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EDWIN DAVID, (DIED) M/S.M.P.SENTHIL, A.MOHAMED HANEEF CHANGE OF VAKALAT FILED FOR AA2 & 3 SR.21008 DT.24.06.2024,M/S.V.M.BALAMOHAN THAMBI FOR A4,A1 - DIED (MEMO FILED USR.4650 DT. 24.11.

  2. 2.BEN DAVID @ IRWIN

  3. 3.FLORENCE, W/O.THANKAPPAN,

  4. 4.A.SURESH, S/O.ANTHONY MUTHU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LAWRENCE,

    Adv. R.T. ARIVUKUMAR FOR R1 ,COURT NOTICE ,-------------,R2 - NOTICE DISPENSE WITH ,(VIDE BATTA SR. 82377 DT: 20.08.

  2. 2.1123

  3. 3.RAJ MOHAN SINGH,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Ms.Justice R. PoornimaView PDF

    Case Summary: SA Nos. 1649/2003 and 237/2004 Court: Madurai Bench, Madras High Court Judge: Hon'ble Ms. Justice R. Poornima Date of Judgment: 01.06.2026 Decision The court upheld the validity of three registered gift deeds executed by Edwin David in favor of his daughter Lawrence on 17.02.1987, rejecting claims of mental incapacity, undue influence, and fraud. Lawrence's second appeal was allowed while Edwin David's heirs' appeal was dismissed, confirming Lawrence's legal title to the gifted properties. Key Findings The court found the gift deeds were genuine, validly executed, and accepted. Documentary evidence including revenue/municipal records mutations, property tax receipts, and letters from Edwin David acknowledging the gifts strongly supported their legitimacy. No credible medical evidence established mental incapacity at execution. The subsequent unilateral cancellation deed Edwin David executed in 1994 was legally ineffective under Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act, as it lacked grounds like fraud or coercion. The suit challenging the deeds was barred by Article 59 of the Limitation Act (three-year period from knowledge), as Edwin David had acknowledged the transactions years earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Mar-2026

    Second Appeal Cases

    Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Second Appeal Cases

    Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Second Appeal Cases

    Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

  6. 12-Aug-2025

    XxXxX

    Honourable Mr Justice R.vijayakumar

  7. 29-Jul-2025

    XxXxX

    Honourable Mr Justice R.vijayakumar

  8. 14-Jul-2025

    xxxxxxx

    Honourable Mr Justice R.vijayakumar

  9. 25-Jun-2025

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice R.vijayakumar

  10. 06-Jun-2025

    For Dismissal

    Honourable Mr Justice G.ilangovan

  11. 24-Mar-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice G.ilangovan

  12. 10-Mar-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice G.ilangovan

  13. 24-Feb-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice V.sivagnanam

  14. 30-Jan-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice V.sivagnanam

  15. 09-Jan-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice V.sivagnanam

  16. 13-Dec-2024

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice V.sivagnanam

  17. 21-Nov-2024

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mrs Justice V.bhavani Subbaroyan

  18. 25-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mrs Justice V.bhavani Subbaroyan

  19. 17-Oct-2024

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mrs Justice V.bhavani Subbaroyan

  20. 24-Sep-2024

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mrs Justice V.bhavani Subbaroyan

  21. 13-Mar-2024

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  22. 17-Aug-2023

    For Final Hearing

    Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

  23. 03-Aug-2023

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice Krishnan Ramasamy

  24. 10-Jan-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  25. 29-Sep-2003

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA/1649/2003

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA Nos. 1649/2003 and 237/2004 Court: Madurai Bench, Madras High Court Judge: Hon'ble Ms. Justice R. Poornima Date of Judgment: 01.06.2026 Decision The court upheld the validity of three registered gift deeds executed by Edwin David in favor of his daughter Lawrence on 17.02.1987, rejecting claims of mental incapacity, undue influence, and fraud. Lawrence's second appeal was allowed while Edwin David's heirs' appeal was dismissed, confirming Lawrence's legal title to the gifted properties. Key Findings The court found the gift deeds were genuine, validly executed, and accepted. Documentary evidence including revenue/municipal records mutations, property tax receipts, and letters from Edwin David acknowledging the gifts strongly supported their legitimacy. No credible medical evidence established mental incapacity at execution. The subsequent unilateral cancellation deed Edwin David executed in 1994 was legally ineffective under Section 126 of the Transfer of Property Act, as it lacked grounds like fraud or coercion. The suit challenging the deeds was barred by Article 59 of the Limitation Act (three-year period from knowledge), as Edwin David had acknowledged the transactions years earlier. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case