Muthulakshmi M/s. Roy and Roy Associates, ,M.ARJUN VARMAN,S.RAJASEKAR vs Perumal — CMP(MD)/3683/2026

Case under U/o 41 Rule 3a of Cpc Section 1699. Next hearing: 03rd July 2026.

Next hearing 03-Jul-2026

CNR: HCMD011845332025

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/104255/2025

Filing Date

28-Nov-2025

Registration No

CMP(MD)/3683/2026

Registration Date

16-Mar-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o 41 Rule 3a of Cpc Section 1699

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Muthulakshmi M/s. Roy and Roy Associates, ,M.ARJUN VARMAN,S.RAJASEKAR

  2. 2.Mookan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Perumal

    Adv. (NOTICE RECEIVED BY SOME OTHER PERSON),SOLE RESPONDENT - PERUMAL,--------- 1123

Case History

  1. 03-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 03-Jul-2026

    Miscellaneous Petitions

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP(MD) 3683/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (dated 12-06-2026) addressed a petition by Muthulakshmi and Mookan seeking to condone a 583-day delay in filing a Second Appeal. The court found that the respondent Perumal had not been properly served—notice was received by a third party instead. The court granted liberty to petitioners to effect substituted service by publication in a Tamil daily newspaper with wide circulation in Madurai District by 29-06-2026, with the case adjourned for hearing on 03-07-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Apr-2026

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 28-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/3683/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP(MD) 3683/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court (dated 12-06-2026) addressed a petition by Muthulakshmi and Mookan seeking to condone a 583-day delay in filing a Second Appeal. The court found that the respondent Perumal had not been properly served—notice was received by a third party instead. The court granted liberty to petitioners to effect substituted service by publication in a Tamil daily newspaper with wide circulation in Madurai District by 29-06-2026, with the case adjourned for hearing on 03-07-2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case