1 Kandan (Died) 2. Murugaiya vs 1. Kanthari (Died) 2. Alagumalai (Died) 3. S.Pethan — CMP(MD)/18086/2025
Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.
CNR: HCMD011487862025
Filing Number
CMP(MD)/89868/2025
Filing Date
16-10-2025
Registration No
CMP(MD)/18086/2025
Registration Date
06-11-2025
Judge
Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Coram
Honourable Ms.Justice R. POORNIMA
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
01st June 2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
1 Kandan (Died) 2. Murugaiya
Adv. K. K. SENTHIL,G.Susiladevi,G.Susiladevi, G.Susiladevi
Murugaiya
Sevathal
Respondent(s)
1. Kanthari (Died) 2. Alagumalai (Died) 3. S.Pethan
Adv. DT 15/04/2026 SR15070,M.SIVA KUMAR FOR R10 TO R16 ,R.SARAVANA PRABHU 1123
Alagumalai
S.Pethan
Allimuthu
Valli
K.Sekar
K.Selvaraj
Nagammal
A.Elambal
Veeran
Samuthiram
Kannayiram
Kaliyammal
Vairamani
Muthu
Ramesh Kumar
Orders
Case Summary: CMP(MD) /18086/2025 The Madras High Court allowed applications to condon a 247-day delay and set aside the abatement of the suit caused by the death of the 2nd respondent (Kanthari). The court also brought proposed respondents 13-16 on record as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, finding the reasons in the supporting affidavit satisfactory despite the objecting counsel failing to file a counter-affidavit. The Registry was directed to amend the cause title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CMP(MD) /18086/2025 The Madras High Court allowed applications to condon a 247-day delay and set aside the abatement of the suit caused by the death of the 2nd respondent (Kanthari). The court also brought proposed respondents 13-16 on record as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, finding the reasons in the supporting affidavit satisfactory despite the objecting counsel failing to file a counter-affidavit. The Registry was directed to amend the cause title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts