1 Kandan (Died) 2. Murugaiya vs 1. Kanthari (Died) 2. Alagumalai (Died) 3. S.Pethan — CMP(MD)/18086/2025

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD011487862025

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/89868/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

CMP(MD)/18086/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Judge

Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Coram

Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.1 Kandan (Died) 2. Murugaiya

    Adv. K. K. SENTHIL,G.Susiladevi,G.Susiladevi, G.Susiladevi

  2. 2.Murugaiya

  3. 3.Sevathal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.1. Kanthari (Died) 2. Alagumalai (Died) 3. S.Pethan

    Adv. DT 15/04/2026 SR15070,M.SIVA KUMAR FOR R10 TO R16 ,R.SARAVANA PRABHU 1123

  2. 2.Alagumalai

  3. 3.S.Pethan

  4. 4.Allimuthu

  5. 5.Valli

  6. 6.K.Sekar

  7. 7.K.Selvaraj

  8. 8.Nagammal

  9. 9.A.Elambal

  10. 10.Veeran

  11. 11.Samuthiram

  12. 12.Kannayiram

  13. 13.Kaliyammal

  14. 14.Vairamani

  15. 15.Muthu

  16. 16.Ramesh Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Ms.Justice R. PoornimaView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP(MD) /18086/2025 The Madras High Court allowed applications to condon a 247-day delay and set aside the abatement of the suit caused by the death of the 2nd respondent (Kanthari). The court also brought proposed respondents 13-16 on record as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, finding the reasons in the supporting affidavit satisfactory despite the objecting counsel failing to file a counter-affidavit. The Registry was directed to amend the cause title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/18086/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP(MD) /18086/2025 The Madras High Court allowed applications to condon a 247-day delay and set aside the abatement of the suit caused by the death of the 2nd respondent (Kanthari). The court also brought proposed respondents 13-16 on record as legal representatives of the deceased 2nd respondent, finding the reasons in the supporting affidavit satisfactory despite the objecting counsel failing to file a counter-affidavit. The Registry was directed to amend the cause title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case