1. Kandan (Died) 2. Murugaiya vs 1. Kanthari (Died) 2. Alagumalai (Died) 3. S.Pethan — CMP(MD)/18083/2025

Case under U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 01st June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD011487832025

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/89865/2025

Filing Date

16-Oct-2025

Registration No

CMP(MD)/18083/2025

Registration Date

06-Nov-2025

Judge

Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Coram

Honourable Ms.Justice R. Poornima

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

01-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 02-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 5 Limitation Act Section 1684

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.1. Kandan (Died) 2. Murugaiya

    Adv. K. K. SENTHIL,G.Susiladevi,G.Susiladevi, G.Susiladevi

  2. 2.Murugaiya

  3. 3.Sevathal

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.1. Kanthari (Died) 2. Alagumalai (Died) 3. S.Pethan

    Adv. R.SARAVANA PRABHU FOR R10 TO R12 1123

  2. 2.Alagumalai

  3. 3.S.Pethan

  4. 4.Allimuthu

  5. 5.Valli

  6. 6.K.Sekar

  7. 7.K.Selvaraj

  8. 8.Nagammal

  9. 9.A.Elambal

  10. 10.Veeran

  11. 11.Samuthiram

  12. 12.Kannayiram

  13. 13.Kaliyammal

  14. 14.Vairamani

  15. 15.Muthu

  16. 16.Ramesh Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Jun-2026

    Honourable Ms.Justice R. PoornimaView PDF

    Case Summary: CMP(MD) Nos. 18083-18085/2025 The Madras High Court allowed applications to condone a 962-day delay in filing to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the 1st respondent and to substitute proposed respondents 10-12 as legal representatives of the deceased respondent. The court was satisfied with the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit and noted the opposing counsel failed to file a counter. The Registry was directed to amend the cause title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/18083/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CMP(MD) Nos. 18083-18085/2025 The Madras High Court allowed applications to condone a 962-day delay in filing to set aside the abatement caused by the death of the 1st respondent and to substitute proposed respondents 10-12 as legal representatives of the deceased respondent. The court was satisfied with the reasons provided in the supporting affidavit and noted the opposing counsel failed to file a counter. The Registry was directed to amend the cause title accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case