TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, M/S.J.S.MURALI vs Subbammal, — CMA(MD)/972/2021
Case under U/s 173 of Motor Vehicle Act Section 173. Disposed: Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010871482021
Filing Number
CMA(MD)/55461/2021
Filing Date
29-10-2021
Registration No
CMA(MD)/972/2021
Registration Date
08-11-2021
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice P.VADAMALAI
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice P.VADAMALAI
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL ( 167 )
Sub-Category
S. 173 of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal Act ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--PARTLY ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, M/S.J.S.MURALI
Respondent(s)
Subbammal,
Adv. T.SATHIYANATHAN ,A.ANANDHA PRAKASH ,FOR R1 TO R5 SR.41236 DT.29.11.2023,R6 TO R9 - DISPENSE WITH (VIDE IN EB) 1123
Raj,
Muthumari,
Santhanamari,
Rajiv Gandhi,
Narayanan,
Jerin,
THE MANAGING PARTNER,
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED,
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr Justice P.VADAMALAI
FOR ADMISSION
CMA - Cases
CMA - Cases
FINAL HEARING CASES
FINAL HEARING CASES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-11-2021 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 26-02-2026 | CMA - Cases |
| 23-02-2026 | CMA - Cases |
| 17-02-2022 | FINAL HEARING CASES |
| 17-01-2022 | FINAL HEARING CASES |
Orders
The Madras High Court partly allowed TATA AIG's appeal, reducing the motor accident compensation from Rs.16,82,800 to Rs.12,79,600. While confirming the Tribunal's finding that the car driver was negligent, the Court recalculated damages by accepting 50% deduction for a bachelor's personal expenses (instead of 1/3) and affirmed the notional income of Rs.9,000/month and multiplier of 16, resulting in loss of income of Rs.12,09,600. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Madras High Court partly allowed TATA AIG's appeal, reducing the motor accident compensation from Rs.16,82,800 to Rs.12,79,600. While confirming the Tribunal's finding that the car driver was negligent, the Court recalculated damages by accepting 50% deduction for a bachelor's personal expenses (instead of 1/3) and affirmed the notional income of Rs.9,000/month and multiplier of 16, resulting in loss of income of Rs.12,09,600. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts