Ponramaraj, M/S.PT.S.NARAENDRAVASAN, M.D.Devi Saravana Priya vs Kanniammal, — SA(MD)/628/2022

Case under U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 100. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010848972022

Filing Number

SA(MD)/54398/2022

Filing Date

30-Aug-2022

Registration No

SA(MD)/628/2022

Registration Date

23-Sep-2022

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Suits ( 149 )

Sub-Category

Mandatory Injunction ( 15 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s 100 of C.p.c Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ponramaraj, M/S.PT.S.NARAENDRAVASAN, M.D.Devi Saravana Priya

  2. 2.Jebamalai,

  3. 3.Kasirajan,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kanniammal,

    Adv. V.KARTHIKEYAN FOR R16 ,COURT NOTICE ,--------------,R12 - THANGARAJPANDIAN ALIAS THANGARAJA,R17 - THE SUB REGISTRAR, Sayalkudi Town, Sub Registrar Office, Sayalkudi, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.,R18 - THE SUB REGISTRAR, Kadaladi Sub Registrar Office, Kadaladi Taluk, Ramanathapuram District.,R19 - THE STATE OF TAMIL NADU, Represented through the District Collector, Ramanathapuram District.,R1 TO R5, R7 TO R11, R13 TO R15 - EXPARTE (VIDE IN EB),FRESH NOTICE ORDERED ON 06.10.2025 FOR R6,--------,R6 - TAPAL NOT YET RETURNED,PVT. NOTICE - PROOF FILED,-----------,R6 - MADASAMY 1123

  2. 2.Murugan,

  3. 3.Amirtham,

  4. 4.Vasanthi,

  5. 5.Veerammal,

  6. 6.Madasamy,

  7. 7.Gandhi,

  8. 8.Veerabathran,

  9. 9.Valarmathi,

  10. 10.Veerammal,

  11. 11.Murugavalli,

  12. 12.Thangarajpandian alias Thangaraja,

  13. 13.Kumaresan,

  14. 14.Govindhan,

  15. 15.Kamatchi,

  16. 16.Ramasamy,

  17. 17.The Sub Registrar,

  18. 18.The Sub Registrar,

  19. 19.The State of Tamil Nadu,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    Case Summary: SA(MD) No. 628/2022 Court Decision: The Madras High Court's Madurai Bench dismissed the plaintiffs' second appeal, upholding the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court. The court rejected the plaintiffs' claims for title declaration, possession recovery, and document nullification regarding disputed agricultural land in Tamil Nadu's Ramanathapuram District. The court found the defendants had validly established ownership through registered sale deeds and revenue record mutations, while the plaintiffs' allegations of forged documents and fraud were unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

  7. 23-Feb-2026

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

  8. 10-Feb-2026

    Sa Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice K.murali Shankar

  9. 28-Oct-2025

    Final Hearing Cases

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalai

  10. 06-Oct-2025

    Honourable Mr Justice P.vadamalaiView PDF

  11. 27-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 30-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. SA(MD)/628/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SA(MD) No. 628/2022 Court Decision: The Madras High Court's Madurai Bench dismissed the plaintiffs' second appeal, upholding the concurrent findings of the trial court and first appellate court. The court rejected the plaintiffs' claims for title declaration, possession recovery, and document nullification regarding disputed agricultural land in Tamil Nadu's Ramanathapuram District. The court found the defendants had validly established ownership through registered sale deeds and revenue record mutations, while the plaintiffs' allegations of forged documents and fraud were unsupported by credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case