Naganathan vs The District Collector — WP(MD)/16376/2026
Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010769712026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/46824/2026
Filing Date
11-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/16376/2026
Registration Date
15-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Public Interest Litigation ( 128 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 18-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Naganathan
Adv. G.V. VAIRAM SANTHOSH,M SARAVANAKUMAR,M SARAVANAKUMAR, ,KANNAN GURUSAMI,N RAMKUMAR,M SARAVANAKUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The District Collector
-
2.The Chairman,
-
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer,
-
4.The Tahsildar,
-
5.Managing Trustee its Rep.bu P. Murugan,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish KUMAR,Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiramanView PDF
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed Naganathan's writ petition seeking to prevent the Pachaiyappa Muthaliyar Trust from installing a statue and memorial hall on trust property in Thanjavur District. The court held that the petitioner was essentially seeking to restrain trustees from exercising their rights over trust property, which constitutes a civil/trust dispute inappropriate for writ jurisdiction. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
For Admission (Pil)
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman
-
11-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/16376/2026
The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court dismissed Naganathan's writ petition seeking to prevent the Pachaiyappa Muthaliyar Trust from installing a statue and memorial hall on trust property in Thanjavur District. The court held that the petitioner was essentially seeking to restrain trustees from exercising their rights over trust property, which constitutes a civil/trust dispute inappropriate for writ jurisdiction. No costs were imposed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts