K.Dhanaraj vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/16356/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010769172026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/46791/2026

Filing Date

11-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16356/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.Dhanaraj

    Adv. D.RAMYA,J.SHAKILA-MS/2218/2007,J.SHAKILA-MS/2218/2007, ,N.SUMITHA,J.SHAKILA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) /16356/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed K. Dhanaraj's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (MDU) Ltd., directing the respondent to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed gratuity, provident fund, leave salary, and EL surrender benefits from retirement until actual payment. The court disposed of the case at the admission stage, relying on established Division Bench precedent, and mandated compliance within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 11-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16356/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) /16356/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed K. Dhanaraj's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (MDU) Ltd., directing the respondent to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed gratuity, provident fund, leave salary, and EL surrender benefits from retirement until actual payment. The court disposed of the case at the admission stage, relying on established Division Bench precedent, and mandated compliance within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case