Jayapaul vs The District Collector — WP(MD)/16333/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010765892026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/46635/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16333/2026

Registration Date

12-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Local Authorities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 18-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jayapaul

    Adv. A.BALAKRISHNAN,N.KARTHIKEYAN-MS/666/2012,N.KARTHIKEYAN-MS/666/2012, ,N.KAMALA JAYANTHI,MANOJKUMAR M,M.N.RAJAPANTH,N.KARTHIKEYAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The District Collector

  2. 2.The Block Development Officer,

  3. 3.The Special Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant ChandangoudarView PDF

    The Madurai High Court disposed of the petition without granting the requested mandamus, instead directing the Block Development Officer to consider the petitioner's representations for meat shop license on their own merits within four weeks. The petitioner's earlier slaughter house had been closed per court directions in 2025, and the current petition sought relief due to administrative inaction on subsequent representations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

  4. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16333/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai High Court disposed of the petition without granting the requested mandamus, instead directing the Block Development Officer to consider the petitioner's representations for meat shop license on their own merits within four weeks. The petitioner's earlier slaughter house had been closed per court directions in 2025, and the current petition sought relief due to administrative inaction on subsequent representations. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case