Vijaya Raj L vs The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited — WP(MD)/16232/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010764192026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/46524/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16232/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijaya Raj L

    Adv. S. ARUNACHALAM, PRAVEENA. R,V.R.ARUNKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD)/16232/2026 The Madurai Bench allowed L. Vijaya Raj's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited for delayed payment of terminal benefits. The court directed the respondent to pay 6% per annum interest (reduced from the petitioner's claimed 18%) on EPF contributions, gratuity, and leave encashment from retirement until payment, with compliance mandated within five months. The issue was settled based on established precedents from prior Division Bench judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16232/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD)/16232/2026 The Madurai Bench allowed L. Vijaya Raj's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited for delayed payment of terminal benefits. The court directed the respondent to pay 6% per annum interest (reduced from the petitioner's claimed 18%) on EPF contributions, gratuity, and leave encashment from retirement until payment, with compliance mandated within five months. The issue was settled based on established precedents from prior Division Bench judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case