Iyappan A vs The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited — WP(MD)/16230/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010764172026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/46522/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16230/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Iyappan A

    Adv. S. ARUNACHALAM, PRAVEENA. R,V.R.ARUNKUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Management of Tamilnadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited

  2. 2.The Administrator

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: The Madurai Bench allowed A. Iyappan's petition seeking interest on delayed payment of his retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest (instead of the requested 18%) on terminal and pension benefits—including EPF contribution, gratuity, leave encashment, and commuted pension value—from retirement date until actual payment, citing established Division Bench precedent. Compliance was mandated within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16230/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Madurai Bench allowed A. Iyappan's petition seeking interest on delayed payment of his retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest (instead of the requested 18%) on terminal and pension benefits—including EPF contribution, gratuity, leave encashment, and commuted pension value—from retirement date until actual payment, citing established Division Bench precedent. Compliance was mandated within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case