A.Rahmath Nisha vs The Deputy Director — WP(MD)/16330/2026
Case under Others Section othrse. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010759652026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/46237/2026
Filing Date
10-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/16330/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Local Authorities ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A.Rahmath Nisha
Adv. JAGADEESHWARAN R
-
2.H. Salamath Jameela,
-
3.V. Barakth Nisha
-
4.R. Kothar Beevi,
-
5.S. Nusrath Rabiya,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Deputy Director
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant ChandangoudarView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16330/2026 The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by five petitioners seeking regularization of house site plots in Sivakasi. The court set aside the Deputy Director's rejection order dated 18.09.2024 and directed reconsideration of their applications within 8 weeks. The key issue was whether the plots were earmarked as "School and Playground" in the 1993 development plan, which the petitioners disputed. The court found the rejection arbitrary without considering the 2021 Government Circular allowing conversion if school/playground facilities exist within 2-3 km radius, and noted any reservation would have lapsed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act if land wasn't acquired within five years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
-
10-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/16330/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16330/2026 The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) allowed the writ petition filed by five petitioners seeking regularization of house site plots in Sivakasi. The court set aside the Deputy Director's rejection order dated 18.09.2024 and directed reconsideration of their applications within 8 weeks. The key issue was whether the plots were earmarked as "School and Playground" in the 1993 development plan, which the petitioners disputed. The court found the rejection arbitrary without considering the 2021 Government Circular allowing conversion if school/playground facilities exist within 2-3 km radius, and noted any reservation would have lapsed under Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act if land wasn't acquired within five years. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts