V.Indira vs The Chief Executive Officer, — WP(MD)/16247/2026

Case under Others Section others. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.

Next hearing 29-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMD010757352026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/46118/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16247/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.V.Indira

    Adv. A. DHARANI,R.ROHINI-MS/2606/2017,R.ROHINI-MS/2606/2017, R.SHRIRAM,S.SHANMUGAM,R.ROHINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chief Executive Officer,

  2. 2.The Financial Advisor cum Chief Accounts Officer,

  3. 3.The Assistant Director,

Case History

  1. 29-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 29-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) 16247/2026 The Madurai Bench directed the Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board to pass orders granting V. Indira additional family pension from the respective dates of entitlement (20% at age 80, 30% at age 85, and 40% at age 90 per G.O. MS No. 42). The respondents acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement but cited financial constraints for non-payment. The case was adjourned to 29.06.2026 for further consideration after respondents submit compliance orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 15-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16247/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) 16247/2026 The Madurai Bench directed the Tamil Nadu Khadi and Village Industries Board to pass orders granting V. Indira additional family pension from the respective dates of entitlement (20% at age 80, 30% at age 85, and 40% at age 90 per G.O. MS No. 42). The respondents acknowledged the petitioner's entitlement but cited financial constraints for non-payment. The case was adjourned to 29.06.2026 for further consideration after respondents submit compliance orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case