G.Palaniappan vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/16145/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010757262026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/46113/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16145/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Palaniappan

    Adv. THANGAMANI C,D.RAMYA-MS/3267/2007,D.RAMYA-MS/3267/2007, ,D.RAMYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.The Administrator,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) 16145/2026 Decision: The Madurai Bench allowed G. Palaniappan's petition and directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of provident fund, gratuity, pension commutation, leave salary, and earned leave surrender from retirement until actual payment. Compliance was mandated within five months. Reasoning: Both parties unanimously agreed the issue was settled by prior Division Bench judgments (2014 and 2021), allowing disposal at the admission stage based on established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16145/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) 16145/2026 Decision: The Madurai Bench allowed G. Palaniappan's petition and directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of provident fund, gratuity, pension commutation, leave salary, and earned leave surrender from retirement until actual payment. Compliance was mandated within five months. Reasoning: Both parties unanimously agreed the issue was settled by prior Division Bench judgments (2014 and 2021), allowing disposal at the admission stage based on established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case