A.Sangilimadan vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/16057/2026
Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010754972026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/45992/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/16057/2026
Registration Date
10-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
15-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.A.Sangilimadan
Adv. D.RAMYA,N.SUMITHA-MS/837/2018,N.SUMITHA-MS/837/2018, ,J.SHAKILA,N.SUMITHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Managing Director
-
2.General Manager,
-
3.The Administrator,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
15-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16057/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed A. Sangilimadan's petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) and the Employees' Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of provident fund, gratuity, pension commutation, leave salary, and earned leave surrender from retirement until actual payment. Compliance was ordered within five months. The court found the issue squarely covered by established Division Bench precedents from 2014 and 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Jun-2026
For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)
Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/16057/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16057/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed A. Sangilimadan's petition and directed Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) and the Employees' Pension Fund Trust to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of provident fund, gratuity, pension commutation, leave salary, and earned leave surrender from retirement until actual payment. Compliance was ordered within five months. The court found the issue squarely covered by established Division Bench precedents from 2014 and 2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts