S.Selvakumar vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/16173/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010754852026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/45983/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16173/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Selvakumar

    Adv. D.RAMYA,J.SHAKILA-MS/2218/2007,J.SHAKILA-MS/2218/2007, ,N.SUMITHA,J.SHAKILA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed S. Selvakumar's petition and directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of provident fund, gratuity, leave salary, and earned leave surrender from his retirement date until actual payment. The court ordered compliance within five months, relying on consistent precedent established in earlier division bench decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16173/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed S. Selvakumar's petition and directed the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Thirunelveli) Limited to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed payments of provident fund, gratuity, leave salary, and earned leave surrender from his retirement date until actual payment. The court ordered compliance within five months, relying on consistent precedent established in earlier division bench decisions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case