S.Sudalai, vs The Managing Director — WP(MD)/16208/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 15th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010754782026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/45979/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/16208/2026

Registration Date

11-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

15-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Sudalai,

    Adv. D.RAMYA, ,J.SHAKILA,N.SUMITHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Managing Director

  2. 2.General Manager,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) 16208/2026 Court Decision: The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed S. Sudalai's writ petition, directing the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed retirement benefits (provident fund, gratuity, leave salary, and EL surrender) from retirement date until actual payment. The respondents must comply within five months from receiving the order. Key Reasoning: Both counsels unanimously agreed the issue was covered by established Division Bench precedents (W.A. 403/2010 dated 15.06.2014 and W.A. 1419/2021 dated 26.07.2021), allowing disposal at admission stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/16208/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) 16208/2026 Court Decision: The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed S. Sudalai's writ petition, directing the Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed retirement benefits (provident fund, gratuity, leave salary, and EL surrender) from retirement date until actual payment. The respondents must comply within five months from receiving the order. Key Reasoning: Both counsels unanimously agreed the issue was covered by established Division Bench precedents (W.A. 403/2010 dated 15.06.2014 and W.A. 1419/2021 dated 26.07.2021), allowing disposal at admission stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case