Ravichandran vs The Additional Registrar General — WP(MD)/16101/2026
Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010751662026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/45808/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/16101/2026
Registration Date
11-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Sub-Category
Subordinate Court Employees ( 20 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ravichandran
Adv. C.SENTHIL MURUGAN,S.JANAKI ,S.JANAKI , ,RAMKUMAR T,R. SHENBAGARAJ,S.JANAKI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Additional Registrar General
-
2.The Principal District Judge,
-
3.The State of Tamil Nadu,
-
4.The Internal Audit Wing,
-
5.The Treasury Officer,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish KUMAR,Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiramanView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16101/2026 - Ravichandran v. Additional Registrar General & Others The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court quashed a recovery order of Rs. 2,17,585/- against Ravichandran, a Junior Assistant (Group-C employee), holding that recovery from Class III/IV service employees is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent. The court found the undertaking for recovery was obtained under coercion and directed refund of any amounts already recovered, while upholding the pay re-fixation order against which the petitioner had no grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
For Admission (Service)
Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/16101/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16101/2026 - Ravichandran v. Additional Registrar General & Others The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court quashed a recovery order of Rs. 2,17,585/- against Ravichandran, a Junior Assistant (Group-C employee), holding that recovery from Class III/IV service employees is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent. The court found the undertaking for recovery was obtained under coercion and directed refund of any amounts already recovered, while upholding the pay re-fixation order against which the petitioner had no grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts