K. Rukmani vs R. Raman Advocate - C. MAHADEVAN, CAVEATOR FOR THE RESPONDENT,MEENAKSHI.S,K.S.KATHIRAVAN — CMP(MD)/7535/2026

Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1683. Disposed: Uncontested--ORDERED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010749762026

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/45732/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CMP(MD)/7535/2026

Registration Date

17-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ORDERED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1683

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K. Rukmani

    Adv. H.LAKSHMI SHANKAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.R. Raman Advocate - C. MAHADEVAN, CAVEATOR FOR THE RESPONDENT,MEENAKSHI.S,K.S.KATHIRAVAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    The court allowed K. Rukmani's petition to condone a 129-day delay in re-presenting a Second Appeal, finding sufficient cause based on the supporting affidavit and counsel's submissions. The Registry was directed to number the Second Appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/7535/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed K. Rukmani's petition to condone a 129-day delay in re-presenting a Second Appeal, finding sufficient cause based on the supporting affidavit and counsel's submissions. The Registry was directed to number the Second Appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case