P.B.Gayathri, vs The Registrar General — WP(MD)/15844/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010746442026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/45517/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/15844/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Sub-Category

Subordinate Court Employees ( 20 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.P.B.Gayathri,

    Adv. SRINIVASAN S, ,VELMURUGAN J

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Registrar General

  2. 2.The Additional Registrar General,

  3. 3.The Subordinate Judge,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish KUMAR,Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiramanView PDF

    Case Summary: P.B. Gayathri v. The Registrar General Decision: The Madras High Court quashed the recovery order directing P.B. Gayathri, a Junior Assistant (Group C employee), to repay Rs. 96,287 in excess salary. The court held that recovery from Class III/Group C service employees is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (*State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih*), and ordered refund of any amounts already recovered. The pay re-fixation was upheld as valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Service)

    Honourable Mr Justice N. Sathish Kumar , Honourable Mr.Justice M.jothiraman

  4. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/15844/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: P.B. Gayathri v. The Registrar General Decision: The Madras High Court quashed the recovery order directing P.B. Gayathri, a Junior Assistant (Group C employee), to repay Rs. 96,287 in excess salary. The court held that recovery from Class III/Group C service employees is impermissible under Supreme Court precedent (*State of Punjab v. Rafiq Masih*), and ordered refund of any amounts already recovered. The pay re-fixation was upheld as valid. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case