Natarajan vs V. Raman, — CMP(MD)/7414/2026

Case under U/s Sec 5 of Limitation Act Section 1688. Disposed: Uncontested--ORDERED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010724712026

Filing Number

CMP(MD)/44298/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

CMP(MD)/7414/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ORDERED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

U/s Sec 5 of Limitation Act Section 1688

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Natarajan

    Adv. D.BALAMURUGAPANDI,T. THARANI,T. THARANI, K.MUNEESWARI,T. THARANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.V. Raman,

  2. 2.Ilavarasi,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF

    The court allowed Natarajan's petition to condone a 115-day delay in re-presenting a Second Appeal. Justice P.B. Balaji found that sufficient cause had been demonstrated through the affidavit and submissions, satisfying the requirements for condonation of delay. The Registry was directed to number the Second Appeal for adjudication if otherwise procedurally in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Jun-2026

    Miscellaneous Admission

    Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CMP(MD)/7414/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Natarajan's petition to condone a 115-day delay in re-presenting a Second Appeal. Justice P.B. Balaji found that sufficient cause had been demonstrated through the affidavit and submissions, satisfying the requirements for condonation of delay. The Registry was directed to number the Second Appeal for adjudication if otherwise procedurally in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case