S.Sasi Kumar vs The Assistant Divisional Engineer — WP(MD)/15328/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCMD010722222026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP(MD)/44151/2026

Filing Date

03-06-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/15328/2026

Registration Date

05-06-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR , Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN

Coram

Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR , Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

Land Acquisition ( 96 )

Sub-Category

Land Encroachment ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

S.Sasi Kumar

Adv. J.ASHOK,M.RAMESH,M.RAMESH, M.SHRI ABARNA,M.RAMESH

Respondent(s)

The Assistant Divisional Engineer

Hearing History

Judge: Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR , Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN

08-06-2026

FOR ADMISSION (LAND ENCROACHMENT)

Orders

08-06-2026
Honourable Mr Justice N. SATHISH KUMAR,Honourable Mr.Justice M.JOTHIRAMAN

Case Summary: WP(MD)/15328/2026 S. Sasi Kumar v. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, National Highways The Madurai Bench disposed of the petition challenging eviction proceedings on encroached National Highway land in Kanyakumari. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for a blanket prohibition on eviction, but directed the respondent to initiate any removal proceedings strictly through due process of law within two months. The respondent's submission that the petitioner had undertaken voluntary removal within one month was accepted, allowing the petition to be disposed with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD)/15328/2026 S. Sasi Kumar v. The Assistant Divisional Engineer, National Highways The Madurai Bench disposed of the petition challenging eviction proceedings on encroached National Highway land in Kanyakumari. The court rejected the petitioner's plea for a blanket prohibition on eviction, but directed the respondent to initiate any removal proceedings strictly through due process of law within two months. The respondent's submission that the petitioner had undertaken voluntary removal within one month was accepted, allowing the petition to be disposed with no costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case