G.Rajesh vs The Regional Passport Officer — WP(MD)/15258/2026

Case under Others Section other. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010721142026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/44076/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/15258/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Citizenship ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Passports Act, 1967 (15 of 1967) ( 3 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section other

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Rajesh

    Adv. ALAGAN M,SANTHOSH KUMAR C-MS/6234/2025,SANTHOSH KUMAR C-MS/6234/2025, V.D.SURESH ,C.MOOVENTHAN,SANTHOSH KUMAR C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Regional Passport Officer

  2. 2.The State of Tamil Nadu Rep by

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant ChandangoudarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD)/15258/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition by granting G. Rajesh liberty to approach the criminal court where his pending case (S.T.C. No. 56 of 2020) is being heard and seek permission for passport issuance, with the criminal court required to decide within four weeks. The court did not issue a direct mandamus for passport issuance, as the Regional Passport Officer had withheld processing based on the pending criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/15258/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD)/15258/2026 Court Decision: The Madras High Court disposed of the writ petition by granting G. Rajesh liberty to approach the criminal court where his pending case (S.T.C. No. 56 of 2020) is being heard and seek permission for passport issuance, with the criminal court required to decide within four weeks. The court did not issue a direct mandamus for passport issuance, as the Regional Passport Officer had withheld processing based on the pending criminal case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case