Guruvammal vs Ganapathiyammal — CMP(MD)/6869/2026
Case under U/o Iv Rule 9(4) of as Rules Section 1683. Disposed: Contested--ORDERED on 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010720512026
Filing Number
CMP(MD)/44041/2026
Filing Date
03-Jun-2026
Registration No
CMP(MD)/6869/2026
Registration Date
05-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ORDERED
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Guruvammal
Adv. R.J.KARTHICK,P.RANJITHRAJA-MS/3019/2018,P.RANJITHRAJA-MS/3019/2018, ,S.SURESH MANICKAM,P.RANJITHRAJA
-
2.Ramesh Kumar
-
3.Ravi
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ganapathiyammal
-
2.Anusuya
-
3.Uma Maheswari
-
4.Subburaj
-
5.Gangammal
-
6.Seenivasagam
-
7.Kavitha
-
8.Sathiya
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF
The court allowed the petitioners' application to condone a 94-day delay in filing a Second Appeal, finding that sufficient cause had been demonstrated through the supporting affidavit and counsel submissions. The Registry was directed to register the Second Appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Miscellaneous Admission
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
-
03-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CMP(MD)/6869/2026
The court allowed the petitioners' application to condone a 94-day delay in filing a Second Appeal, finding that sufficient cause had been demonstrated through the supporting affidavit and counsel submissions. The Registry was directed to register the Second Appeal if otherwise in order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts