K.M.Rajaraman, vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd., — WP(MD)/15209/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010717272026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/43819/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/15209/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 10-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.K.M.Rajaraman,

    Adv. A.RAHUL,HEMABHARATHI R-MS/7664/2023,HEMABHARATHI R-MS/7664/2023, ,HEMABHARATHI R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd.,

  2. 2.The General Manager,

  3. 3.The Deputy Manager (Provident Fund),

  4. 4.The Branch Manager,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD)/15209/2026 The Madurai High Court granted K.M. Rajaraman's writ petition seeking expedited release of his provident fund for his daughter's marriage. Although the respondents claimed he was entitled to only Rs. 5,59,000 (not the requested Rs. 7,00,000), the court rejected their proposed four-week timeline as unreasonable, noting the petitioner had applied on 08.05.2026 for a marriage scheduled 24.06.2026. The court directed immediate release of Rs. 5,59,000 within one week, holding that employees cannot be unjustifiably denied their own funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/15209/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD)/15209/2026 The Madurai High Court granted K.M. Rajaraman's writ petition seeking expedited release of his provident fund for his daughter's marriage. Although the respondents claimed he was entitled to only Rs. 5,59,000 (not the requested Rs. 7,00,000), the court rejected their proposed four-week timeline as unreasonable, noting the petitioner had applied on 08.05.2026 for a marriage scheduled 24.06.2026. The court directed immediate release of Rs. 5,59,000 within one week, holding that employees cannot be unjustifiably denied their own funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case