Nambiyappan S vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited — WP(MD)/14959/2026
Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010711672026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/43544/2026
Filing Date
02-06-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/14959/2026
Registration Date
03-06-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Service ( 140 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
05th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Nambiyappan S
Adv. A.RAHUL, ,HEMABHARATHI R
Respondent(s)
The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited
The General Manager
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice MUMMINENI SUDHEER KUMAR
ADMISSION (WP)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-06-2026 | ADMISSION (WP) |
Orders
Summary of WP(MD) No.14959/2026 The Madras High Court allowed Nambiyappan's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam), directing the corporation to permit him to encash 104 days of earned leave salary and pay it with 6% annual interest from his superannuation date. The court relied on prior binding precedent (WP(MD) 2449/2018, upheld by Division Bench in 2019) establishing that employees denied leave encashment during the corporation's financial crisis are entitled to compensation, and rejected the financial crisis argument as insufficient grounds to deprive earned benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of WP(MD) No.14959/2026 The Madras High Court allowed Nambiyappan's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam), directing the corporation to permit him to encash 104 days of earned leave salary and pay it with 6% annual interest from his superannuation date. The court relied on prior binding precedent (WP(MD) 2449/2018, upheld by Division Bench in 2019) establishing that employees denied leave encashment during the corporation's financial crisis are entitled to compensation, and rejected the financial crisis argument as insufficient grounds to deprive earned benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts