Nambiyappan S vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited — WP(MD)/14959/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010711672026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/43544/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14959/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nambiyappan S

    Adv. A.RAHUL, ,HEMABHARATHI R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited

  2. 2.The General Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Summary of WP(MD) No.14959/2026 The Madras High Court allowed Nambiyappan's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam), directing the corporation to permit him to encash 104 days of earned leave salary and pay it with 6% annual interest from his superannuation date. The court relied on prior binding precedent (WP(MD) 2449/2018, upheld by Division Bench in 2019) establishing that employees denied leave encashment during the corporation's financial crisis are entitled to compensation, and rejected the financial crisis argument as insufficient grounds to deprive earned benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Admission (Wp)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14959/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP(MD) No.14959/2026 The Madras High Court allowed Nambiyappan's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam), directing the corporation to permit him to encash 104 days of earned leave salary and pay it with 6% annual interest from his superannuation date. The court relied on prior binding precedent (WP(MD) 2449/2018, upheld by Division Bench in 2019) establishing that employees denied leave encashment during the corporation's financial crisis are entitled to compensation, and rejected the financial crisis argument as insufficient grounds to deprive earned benefits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case