P.Samraj vs The Registrar — WP(MD)/14772/2026
Case under Others Section othres. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010704002026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/43107/2026
Filing Date
01-06-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/14772/2026
Registration Date
02-06-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Education ( 54 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
P.Samraj
Adv. MUKILAN S,L.ARPITHA,L.ARPITHA, K.V.PAVITHRA,VIVEKANANDAN B,J.AKILLANDEESWARI,L.ARPITHA
Respondent(s)
The Registrar
The Controller of Examination,
The Principal,
The Director,
Hearing History
Judge: Honourable Mr.Justice HEMANT CHANDANGOUDAR
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 08-06-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
Orders
CASE SUMMARY: WP(MD)/14772/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 08.06.2026. The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) impleaded the Bar Council of India as a fifth respondent to clarify whether UGC guidelines or Bar Council Rules govern LL.M. course completion timelines. The petitioner seeks permission to appear for a pending arrear exam despite exceeding the 2-year completion deadline applicable under UGC guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
CASE SUMMARY: WP(MD)/14772/2026 Outcome: Case adjourned to 08.06.2026. The Madras High Court (Madurai Bench) impleaded the Bar Council of India as a fifth respondent to clarify whether UGC guidelines or Bar Council Rules govern LL.M. course completion timelines. The petitioner seeks permission to appear for a pending arrear exam despite exceeding the 2-year completion deadline applicable under UGC guidelines. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts