G.Balakrishnan vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd. — WP(MD)/14911/2026

Case under Others Section others. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010703402026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/43067/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14911/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.G.Balakrishnan

    Adv. A.RAHUL, ,HEMABHARATHI R

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Madurai) Ltd.

  2. 2.The Administrator

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: WP(MD) No.14911/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed G. Balakrishnan's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust Administrator, directing them to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed disbursement of terminal benefits (Provident Fund, Gratuity, Terminal Leave Salary, and Commuted Pension Value) from retirement until actual payment. The court ordered compliance within five months, relying on settled precedent from earlier Division Bench judgments on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14911/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP(MD) No.14911/2026 The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed G. Balakrishnan's petition against Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation and the Pension Fund Trust Administrator, directing them to pay 6% per annum interest on delayed disbursement of terminal benefits (Provident Fund, Gratuity, Terminal Leave Salary, and Commuted Pension Value) from retirement until actual payment. The court ordered compliance within five months, relying on settled precedent from earlier Division Bench judgments on the same issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case