Mahadevan K vs The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited — WP(MD)/14837/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 04th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010701152026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/42919/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14837/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

04-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadevan K

    Adv. D.SIVA RAMAN, ,A.BALAJI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam) Limited

  2. 2.The General Manager

  3. 3.The General Manager

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai Bench allowed K. Mahadevan's petition seeking interest on delayed voluntary retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam). The court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest (lower than the requested 18%) on the petitioner's provident fund and earned leave encashment from retirement until payment, applying precedent from prior Division Bench judgments, with compliance required within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14837/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench allowed K. Mahadevan's petition seeking interest on delayed voluntary retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation (Kumbakonam). The court directed the respondents to pay 6% per annum interest (lower than the requested 18%) on the petitioner's provident fund and earned leave encashment from retirement until payment, applying precedent from prior Division Bench judgments, with compliance required within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case