K.Muthusamy vs The District Collector, — WP(MD)/16281/2026
Case under Others Section others. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010700322026
Filing Number
WP(MD)/42858/2026
Filing Date
01-Jun-2026
Registration No
WP(MD)/16281/2026
Registration Date
12-Jun-2026
Judge
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
Coram
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Property Laws ( 126 )
Sub-Category
Succession Certificate ( 4 )
Judicial Branch
Writ Section
Decision Date
16-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 17-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.K.Muthusamy
Adv. HAJA MOHIDEEN A, M.Mohamed Mustafa Haris ,M.Abdul Javith Akthar ,SK.Pavithra
Respondent(s)
-
1.The District Collector,
-
2.The District Revenue Officer
-
3.The Revenue Divisional Officer
-
4.Aavudayammal
-
5.Ramalakshmi
-
6.Seenivasan
-
7.Suresh
-
8.Vellathai
-
9.Ayyanar
-
10.Mariyammal
-
11.Kavitha
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant ChandangoudarView PDF
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16281/2026 K. Muthusamy sought to cancel a legal heir certificate issued to respondents 4-11 for the estate of late Krishnan @ Krishna Konar (died 2017), claiming he was wrongfully excluded as the deceased's son from the first marriage. The Madras High Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider his representation on merits within 8 weeks, after affording hearing to all parties, without deciding the substantive claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2026
For Admission
Honourable Mr.Justice Hemant Chandangoudar
-
01-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP(MD)/16281/2026
Case Summary: WP(MD)/16281/2026 K. Muthusamy sought to cancel a legal heir certificate issued to respondents 4-11 for the estate of late Krishnan @ Krishna Konar (died 2017), claiming he was wrongfully excluded as the deceased's son from the first marriage. The Madras High Court directed the Revenue Divisional Officer to consider his representation on merits within 8 weeks, after affording hearing to all parties, without deciding the substantive claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts