Pappathi vs K.Ammaiyappan (Died) 1. Palanisamy — CMP(MD)/9288/2025
Case under U/o 22 Rule 4 C.p.c Section 1687. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
CNR: HCMD010699762025
Filing Number
CMP(MD)/48561/2025
Filing Date
13-Jun-2025
Registration No
CMP(MD)/9288/2025
Registration Date
18-Jun-2025
Judge
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
Coram
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Pappathi
Adv. K. GOVINDARAJAN,B.Ponnupandi,B.Ponnupandi, B.Ponnupandi
Respondent(s)
-
1.K.Ammaiyappan (Died) 1. Palanisamy
Adv. R5- TAPAL RETURNED - DECEASED ,R-6 MURUGAN,-----------,PVT NOTICE - PROOF FILED ,R5- TAPAL RETURNED- DECEASED ,R6- SERVICE AWAITED ,R-8 RENUGA,R-7 MARIMUTHU,------------- 1123
-
2.Kamatchi
-
3.P.Gopal
-
4.Sadayammal alias Chinnapillai
-
5.Backiyam
-
6.Murugan
-
7.Marimuthu
-
8.Renuga
Case History
-
15-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Miscellaneous Petitions
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
-
10-Jun-2026
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. BalajiView PDF
Case Summary: CMP(MD) 9288 & 9289/2025 The Madras High Court allowed both petitions seeking to substitute deceased respondents with their legal heirs in the underlying appeals (S.A.(MD) Nos. 217 & 221 of 2017). Service of notice on proposed respondents was completed, and the petitioner's counsel confirmed that legal heirs of deceased parties were already on record. The court directed the Registry to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title to reflect the substitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Miscellaneous Petitions
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
-
04-Jun-2026
Miscellaneous Petitions
Honourable Mr Justice P.B. Balaji
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CMP(MD)/9288/2025
Case Summary: CMP(MD) 9288 & 9289/2025 The Madras High Court allowed both petitions seeking to substitute deceased respondents with their legal heirs in the underlying appeals (S.A.(MD) Nos. 217 & 221 of 2017). Service of notice on proposed respondents was completed, and the petitioner's counsel confirmed that legal heirs of deceased parties were already on record. The court directed the Registry to carry out necessary amendments in the cause title to reflect the substitution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts