S.Rajathi vs The Chief Executive Officer — WP(MD)/14938/2026

Case under Others Section others. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCMD010699072026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/42791/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14938/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.Rajathi

    Adv. R.J.KARTHICK,P.RANJITHRAJA-MS/3019/2018,P.RANJITHRAJA-MS/3019/2018, R.KIRTHENATHAN,K.Pragadesh Ganapathy,AJITH KUMAR K,S.SURESH MANICKAM,P.RANJITHRAJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Chief Executive Officer

  2. 2.The Chief Operating Officer,

  3. 3.The Associate Chief Operating Officer (M and E),

  4. 4.The District Collector,

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    For Admission

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: The court found prima facie that petitioner S. Rajathi's termination order was issued without any enquiry despite her denial of alleged lapses, and appeared to violate HR Manual guidelines. The case was adjourned to 15.06.2026 with directions to the Government counsel to obtain specific instructions on how to sustain the impugned termination order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-Jun-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14938/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court found prima facie that petitioner S. Rajathi's termination order was issued without any enquiry despite her denial of alleged lapses, and appeared to violate HR Manual guidelines. The case was adjourned to 15.06.2026 with directions to the Government counsel to obtain specific instructions on how to sustain the impugned termination order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case