Jeya K vs The General Manager — WP(MD)/14853/2026

Case under Others Section Others. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCMD010698442026

Filing Number

WP(MD)/42761/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

WP(MD)/14853/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Coram

Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Service ( 140 )

Judicial Branch

Writ Section

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 07-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Others Section Others

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jeya K

    Adv. N.S.RAMAKRISHNA DASS,PREMKUMAR. NS,PREMKUMAR. NS, PREMKUMAR. NS

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The General Manager

  2. 2.The Administrator

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer KumarView PDF

    The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed K. Jeya's petition seeking 6% interest on delayed retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed the respondents to pay interest at 6% per annum on all retirement benefits (Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave Encashment, and other benefits) from the retirement date until actual payment, citing established precedent from previous Division Bench judgments, with compliance required within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-Jun-2026

    For Admission (Transport - Interest Matters)

    Honourable Mr.Justice Mummineni Sudheer Kumar

  4. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP(MD)/14853/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Madurai Bench of Madras High Court allowed K. Jeya's petition seeking 6% interest on delayed retirement benefits from Tamil Nadu State Transport Corporation. The court directed the respondents to pay interest at 6% per annum on all retirement benefits (Provident Fund, Gratuity, Leave Encashment, and other benefits) from the retirement date until actual payment, citing established precedent from previous Division Bench judgments, with compliance required within five months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case